My Take May Not Be Popular, But I’m Being Honest

Our society has developed a troubling habit: we relentlessly criticize individuals, companies, or agencies when they don’t meet our expectations on our timeline. It’s almost like we’ve become spoiled, demanding perfection without room for error or compromise. The mantra seems to be, “Do it my way, or you’re done.” This attitude is nowhere more evident than in Washington, D.C., where the Department of Justice (DOJ) is currently under fire over the Jeffrey Epstein case. As someone who supports the principles of “America First” and has voted for Donald Trump in three elections, I find myself at odds with the outrage directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi and the DOJ. Let’s take a step back, examine the situation, and consider whether this criticism is fair or a distraction from more pressing issues.

I never met Jeffrey Epstein, and my understanding of his actions comes solely from media reports. The allegations paint him as a deeply immoral individual who committed heinous acts against young women. If true, his death in 2019 ensures he’s facing whatever consequences await in the afterlife, assuming one believes in such things. But my purpose here isn’t to judge Epstein’s soul—it’s to question the frenzy surrounding his case, particularly the recent uproar over the so-called “Epstein Files” and the elusive “customer list.”

The MAGA community, which I align with on many issues, is furious about the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein case under Attorney General Pam Bondi. Social media platforms like X are ablaze with accusations, with some calling prominent figures like Dan Bongino and Kash Patel “sellouts” and others, like independent journalist Laura Loomer, demanding Bondi’s resignation. This reaction stems from a recent cabinet meeting where President Trump and Bondi addressed the DOJ’s work. When a reporter asked about the Epstein files, Trump and Bondi dismissed the question, labeling Epstein a “slime” and stating that his suicide closed the case. This response has been interpreted by some as a refusal to pursue justice, igniting a firestorm of criticism. I see it differently.

The Trump administration, in less than 200 days, has made significant strides in areas like border security, job creation, crime reduction, and economic growth. The DOJ, under Bondi’s leadership, has been instrumental in these efforts. Yet, instead of focusing on these achievements or pressing issues like the devastating Texas floods—where the administration is aiding recovery efforts—some are fixated on a case involving a man who’s been dead for years. This feels like a misallocation of attention, especially when the DOJ is tackling real-time challenges that affect Americans today.Positive DOJ Actions in 2025To put this in perspective, let’s highlight some of the DOJ’s accomplishments in 2025, which demonstrate its commitment to justice and public safety:

• Crackdown on Violent Crime: The DOJ has intensified efforts to combat violent crime, with federal task forces targeting high-crime areas, leading to a reported 10% reduction in violent crime rates in major cities (based on FBI preliminary data for 2025).

• Fentanyl Trafficking Prosecutions: The DOJ has prioritized dismantling fentanyl trafficking networks, securing convictions against over 1,200 defendants in 2025, disrupting the flow of deadly opioids into communities.

• Civil Rights Enforcement: The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division has pursued cases to protect voting rights and address systemic discrimination, including a high-profile settlement ensuring accessibility for disabled voters in multiple states.

• Cybercrime Initiatives: With cyber threats on the rise, the DOJ launched operations to counter ransomware attacks, recovering millions in cryptocurrency from illicit networks and enhancing cybersecurity protections.

• Support for Disaster Recovery: Following the Texas floods, the DOJ has coordinated with FEMA to investigate fraud related to relief funds, ensuring aid reaches those in need while prosecuting bad actors.

These efforts show a DOJ actively engaged in addressing current issues, from public safety to disaster response. Critics might argue that the Epstein case deserves equal attention, but with Epstein deceased and no new evidence suggesting a broader conspiracy, the DOJ’s focus on immediate priorities seems justified. I stand with Trump and Bondi on this one, lets move on.

The Epstein Case: A Distraction from Present Needs

I’m all for holding evil individuals accountable, and if there were credible evidence of ongoing crimes tied to Epstein’s network, the DOJ should investigate. However, the current outrage seems driven by speculation about a “customer list” that may or may not exist. The DOJ’s position—that Epstein’s suicide in 2019 effectively closed the case—aligns with the lack of new, actionable leads. Harping on this issue risks overshadowing the DOJ’s tangible achievements and diverts resources from pressing concerns like crime, drug trafficking, and disaster recovery. Contrast this with the DOJ’s performance under previous administrations. During the Obama and Biden years, critics often pointed to politicized decisions or slow responses to crises. Under Bondi, the DOJ has shown efficiency and focus, yet it’s being attacked over a case with no clear path forward. The call for Bondi’s resignation, as voiced by figures like Loomer, ignores her team’s hard work and the broader context of their responsibilities.

A Call for Reason
Mistakes happen—by individuals, agencies, journalists, and even presidents. Pounding on the DOJ for not prioritizing a decades-old case over current crises reflects the “my way or the highway” mindset that’s tearing at our ability to compromise and move forward. The Epstein case is tragic, and justice for his victims matters, but fixating on it at the expense of today’s challenges is shortsighted. The DOJ, under Bondi’s leadership, is delivering results for Americans now. Let’s give credit where it’s due and focus on solving the problems of today rather than chasing ghosts from the past.

I understand that some will disagree, arguing that letting past crimes go unpunished perpetuates a culture of corruption. I know you think high-up people like Clinton and Gates are on the list, and you want them to pay a price. I hear you, and I respect your concerns. But I am going to believe Bondi when she says there is no evidence (see video below). Moreover, fixating on the Epstein case at this moment risks derailing the DOJ’s current efforts and could hand Democrats an advantage in the midterms and 2028 by shifting focus from critical priorities like border security, crime reduction, and disaster recovery. If we truly want to Make America Great Again, we should give the dedicated professionals at the DOJ and FBI—people with families and emotions like ours—a chance to do their jobs without relentless criticism over a single decision. No, they are not perfect, but neither are you nor I. Overall, they’ve delivered real results, yet rarely receive praise for their hard work. Take a step back, consider the bigger picture, and you’ll see that prioritizing today’s challenges over a closed case is the practical path forward. If history repeats itself, if there are people who are getting away with the crimes associated with Epstein, trust in karma — much like Epstein, they too will pay a price later on.

Let’s focus on what matters right now.